Jan
10
Filed Under (Babbling Point) by cpyrexia on 10-01-2007

THE current controversy over the midnight transfer of convicted rapist, US Marine Daniel Smith, to the custody of the US Embassy rightly focuses on the substantive constitutional issue; but it probably inadvertently misses the case’s implications on the 2007 Philippine elections.

The political opposition should realize that the Smith case has the potential of, at worst, costing it the May 2007 elections and ensuring the continued dominance of the present administration.
Marinerapist1206_1

The US government is well known for being supportive of “friendly” (read: fawning) officials of foreign governments regardless of their standing among their own people (e.g., Manuel Noriega of Panama, Saddam Hussein of Iraq and our own Ferdinand Marcos). The US government intervenes financially and logistically to ensure the continuation in office of such leaders (notwithstanding its failure to prevent Daniel Ortega of Nicaragua, Hugo Chavez of Venezuela and, perhaps, also Luiz Ignacio Lula da Silva of Brazil from winning).

May 2007 is not a presidential election, but the survival of the present administration is at stake in that exercise. I am not suggesting that the Americans will violate Philippine electoral laws, although that is not a farfetched possibility. But they can legally provide more financial and logistical aid to the Philippines, which our incumbent officials can rechannel to other uses, such as helping ensure the victory of administration candidates.

Unfortunately, our opposition currently suffers from a lack of charismatic, nationalistic leaders who have the appeal of an Ortega, Chavez or Lula; and, therefore, “logistics” can play a more decisive role in our forthcoming elections.

Tagged as:Daniel Smith , rape case ,Philippine elections 2007